2011-04-13 | ChurchShield

nicely done

love it.

Really nice concept and well executed. Great job.

Professionally executed and lovely font. However, broken shield – not a good image.

I Agree with “Designer”. I really like the concept, but I think a straight shield would be better. Even the cross at the intersections would feel nicer.

But is a good work.

Love the typeface, however isn’t the point of a shield, especially in this market, not to be be broken?

I love that currently there are 33 votes for this and it’s rated 3.33 out of 5. The church sure knows how to play up the trinity.

I don’t see it as a broken shield, but as several small bits put together to create a shield. The fact that there are no gaps, but rather just overlapping makes me think of it on the “put-together” side of the scale than the “broken” side. However, when going with this sort of design, there’s always a risk of getting too close to a certain “no-no” symbol, but I think this one is safe.

This one’s real close to being perfect for me. The “broken-up” shield is not much of an issue for me, I agree with Eddy (my dad’s name, by the way. Dad?) in this regard. I think I’d aim for more symmetry in the cross, though. Particularly on the vertical part. I feel this can be done without compromising the overall feel of the mark and would be beneficial…

I don’t see it as broken so much as off-center or crooked, which makes it seem wrongly askewed to me.

It’s close but no cigarillo IMO.