(223 votes, average: 2.08 out of 5)
Logo Of The Day Award Winner:

2010-11-09 | Lantel

Lantel insightful solutions. Technological solutions company, executes IT and communication related projects.

Credits: Osvaldas Valutis

Related Logos:

11 Comments to “2010-11-09 | Lantel”

Stephen Kistner
Nov 9, 2010 at 7:11 pm

Great use of negative space! You can definitely tell that this is a logo for a computer-related company.

Nov 9, 2010 at 10:11 pm

Very nice—simple, engaging, and works well in 1C.

Nov 10, 2010 at 12:51 am

Great, clean and crisp techno style. Thanks for the post. :)

Paulo Fernandes
Nov 10, 2010 at 1:47 am

This is a great logo! It works well for what its intended to, it’s easy to remember and just overall a good logo. Creative too! The audience might having problems finding the letters in the negative space though.

Ariel Ferro
Nov 10, 2010 at 8:26 am

Techie people would see “disorder” in this one, common people just get an “awful negative space jungle” right there…. i don´t like it, sorry

Nov 10, 2010 at 5:23 pm

From the point of aesthetics – To me, everything is flowing well with exception to the ‘t’. it looks forced with this style, making it feel somewhat awkward and unresolved.

Nov 12, 2010 at 9:13 am

My mind fights w/this…reminds me of the \JESUS\ logo from the 70’s, which was cool – not sure I’d do it again.

Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 pm

i’d say that they should have add a triangle [or something] uner the A , to make it more clear..
i mean this logo is not readable at all while driving or some.. i dunno , i would never sell something like that..

Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 am

I like the concept but it feels forced. The L is definitely not immediate until you read that it is in fact “lantel”. Without knowing that’s what it was by reading the treatment, I’m not sure I’d get it. Definitely wouldn’t get it with a short exposure like outdoor placement etc. Needs a bit of refinement to really connect to a casual audience I think.

Dec 27, 2010 at 5:57 pm

To me, it looks like “tantel”

Robin Solis
Jan 9, 2011 at 4:22 pm

If only the leading L could have been clearer.