Comments on: 2010-04-28 | Vibucks

By: Adamo

Adamo — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:53:25 +0000

I agree with Heinrich. The logo will no doubt serve its purpose – however all the same, its quite ambiguous and uninspiring.

I can understand it’s a typographic mark. Even so, its nothing groundbreaking. Chopeh has some amazing work, but this is a weaker piece of his.

@Marnie B – What idea? Or am I not seeing something?

@Slks – lol, I think Antrex was being sarcastic? Could be wrong.

By: Slks

Slks — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:17:40 +0000

Aside from the quality of the logo.. @Antrex, an identity must have an icon to be a logo?

By: Heinrich

Heinrich — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:52:31 +0000

I like the typeface but the logo itself isn’t hugely inspiring. Chopeh has done some amazing work but this isn’t one of his better creations I think.

By: Antrex

Antrex — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:37:04 +0000

Is this typo of the day?

By: Tim B

Tim B — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:16:16 +0000

Vibucks owner Marcel Doornbos claims that he likes to design. This logo doesn’t say much for his design capabilities. In fact it doesn’t say much of anything.

By: klaudika

klaudika — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:30:27 +0000

Agree with MarnieB about the warp, looks Weird

By: Marnie B

Marnie B — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:54:02 +0000

I like the idea, but it almost looks to me like it has this odd warp on it.

By: Ariel

Ariel — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:56:52 +0000

it says nothing about what Vibucks or Uibucks is about… so, it’s not good at all

By: Eric Schultz

Eric Schultz — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:55:23 +0000

Hate the gradient and I agree with fabrica19m, the v looks too much like a u.

Not a good logo.

By: fabrica19

fabrica19 — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:59:50 +0000

This is very similar to UIBUCKS, even more than VIBUCKS. Bad, very bad.