<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010-02-08 &#124; Greenere Industries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Igor Delov</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Delov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5938</guid>
		<description>I like the idea, it s very nice, clear and memorable but i would make the graphical final touch simpler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea, it s very nice, clear and memorable but i would make the graphical final touch simpler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamo</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5899</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5899</guid>
		<description>Clever idea with the &#039;G&#039;, but agree with AlexTex. The Recycle symbol is very old hat. In a this world of the environmentally conscious, designers are going to have to try a lot harder. 

No more rehashed versions of Gary Anderson&#039;s work, and definitely no more pretty green leafs either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever idea with the &#8216;G&#8217;, but agree with AlexTex. The Recycle symbol is very old hat. In a this world of the environmentally conscious, designers are going to have to try a lot harder. </p>
<p>No more rehashed versions of Gary Anderson&#8217;s work, and definitely no more pretty green leafs either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Farrell</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>very well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie V</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>I agree with the comments that it&#039;s a good concept, but lacking a bit in execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the comments that it&#8217;s a good concept, but lacking a bit in execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5890</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5890</guid>
		<description>I for one like it. I think its simple and it gets its idea across to the audience. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one like it. I think its simple and it gets its idea across to the audience. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>I think the idea sounds good, but in execution the amount that the recycling symbol has to be altered vitiates its effectiveness (Word of the day. YES) Anyway. Also the house seems to be a bit out of place. It&#039;s a good idea, just not quite simple enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea sounds good, but in execution the amount that the recycling symbol has to be altered vitiates its effectiveness (Word of the day. YES) Anyway. Also the house seems to be a bit out of place. It&#8217;s a good idea, just not quite simple enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajaram</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5888</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5888</guid>
		<description>The concept is very creative and cool! My huge congrats to Al Kerby, ProRank Studios</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept is very creative and cool! My huge congrats to Al Kerby, ProRank Studios</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennae @ Hibiscus Creative</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennae @ Hibiscus Creative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5887</guid>
		<description>The concept is there, but the execution of it needs some work. Trying to turn the symbol into a G ruins the continuity of the recycling symbol and therefore the continuity of the cycle and the intended meaning of the symbol. 

Also, at first glance, rather than a G, the icon just looks like a misshapen recycling symbol. I like the idea, but it doesn&#039;t quite work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept is there, but the execution of it needs some work. Trying to turn the symbol into a G ruins the continuity of the recycling symbol and therefore the continuity of the cycle and the intended meaning of the symbol. </p>
<p>Also, at first glance, rather than a G, the icon just looks like a misshapen recycling symbol. I like the idea, but it doesn&#8217;t quite work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maciej Szylke</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5886</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Szylke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5886</guid>
		<description>Sorry, should be: *should NOT do when refering to ecology*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, should be: *should NOT do when refering to ecology*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maciej Szylke</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5885</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Szylke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5885</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the idea of recycling is broken here. I don&#039;t know if it is just a mistake or maybe on purpose but it looks like this house is only ejecting the waste/energy/materials to be reused by someone else - so this is completely what it should do when refering to ecology.
I believe it is important to care about the idea of the signs we are transforming :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the idea of recycling is broken here. I don&#8217;t know if it is just a mistake or maybe on purpose but it looks like this house is only ejecting the waste/energy/materials to be reused by someone else &#8211; so this is completely what it should do when refering to ecology.<br />
I believe it is important to care about the idea of the signs we are transforming <img src='http://logooftheday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anything Graphic</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5884</link>
		<dc:creator>Anything Graphic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5884</guid>
		<description>I think that is pretty darn cool :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is pretty darn cool <img src='http://logooftheday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexTex</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2010-02-08-greenere-industries/#comment-5882</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexTex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=2112#comment-5882</guid>
		<description>Eco-logo and eco-design... Clever the idea of the &quot;G&quot; but ecycling symbol is so abused with this kind of concepts... missing originality I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eco-logo and eco-design&#8230; Clever the idea of the &#8220;G&#8221; but ecycling symbol is so abused with this kind of concepts&#8230; missing originality I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/9 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-05-23 11:18:20 -->
