<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-08-21 &#124; Riciclick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-9394</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-9394</guid>
		<description>Wait, what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griajeng</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4955</link>
		<dc:creator>griajeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4955</guid>
		<description>too complex fo a logo, sometimes simple is smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too complex fo a logo, sometimes simple is smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>I like the concept but I&#039;m not a fan of the execution... I looked at it for awhile trying to like it, but it&#039;s just so messy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept but I&#8217;m not a fan of the execution&#8230; I looked at it for awhile trying to like it, but it&#8217;s just so messy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clavigne</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4249</link>
		<dc:creator>Clavigne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4249</guid>
		<description>Great concept...not sure if these logos work all that well together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great concept&#8230;not sure if these logos work all that well together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4248</guid>
		<description>nice logo polka. I&#039;m not sure if it really works. 

I get the idea of the logo &quot;recycling&quot; but with all the logos out there, is this really what will get prospects and clients&#039; attention and keep it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice logo polka. I&#8217;m not sure if it really works. </p>
<p>I get the idea of the logo &#8220;recycling&#8221; but with all the logos out there, is this really what will get prospects and clients&#8217; attention and keep it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reyals</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4247</link>
		<dc:creator>reyals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4247</guid>
		<description>it sucks, too complex, too many colours, will not scale well, pretty much logo prostitution (for the ones used) no, no, no, no, no. one good thing though, weirdly enough it does have visual balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it sucks, too complex, too many colours, will not scale well, pretty much logo prostitution (for the ones used) no, no, no, no, no. one good thing though, weirdly enough it does have visual balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamo</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4246</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4246</guid>
		<description>Concept is really good. However, the execution could be improved. 
The logo feels too well segmented, the sleek/glossy looking typefaces don&#039;t evoke much of a &#039;recycled&#039; feel. (for me) 

Love your work on your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concept is really good. However, the execution could be improved.<br />
The logo feels too well segmented, the sleek/glossy looking typefaces don&#8217;t evoke much of a &#8216;recycled&#8217; feel. (for me) </p>
<p>Love your work on your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ev4n</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>ev4n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Dont like this one very much, way too complex for a logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont like this one very much, way too complex for a logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surialism</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>Surialism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>i wonder if the elements in logo were really made from a real existing logo

the concept is there

nice work

*imagining the BW version*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder if the elements in logo were really made from a real existing logo</p>
<p>the concept is there</p>
<p>nice work</p>
<p>*imagining the BW version*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasami</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>humm interesting, i like the concept but im not really sure about how it look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>humm interesting, i like the concept but im not really sure about how it look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by Turboface</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-21-riciclick/#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by Turboface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1610#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by Turboface [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by Turboface [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/9 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-05-22 16:16:30 -->
