Comments on: 2009-08-12 | Mc milan

By: Gerard Syms

Gerard Syms — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:47:51 +0000

Good day everyone and thanks to both of the judges. I admire your respective works.

Now, I’ve seen this logo on various sites and immediately connected with the furniture message, which is communicated in a dynamic way. However, whilst I generalized their message, I wasn’t even close to thinking production and design of kitchens. I admire it though.

By: MrSunnyZ

MrSunnyZ — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:01:40 +0000

I am sure I’ve seen similar use of the 3 wavy stripes (maybe at a different orientation to suggest a different meaning) so the composition is not unique, but uniqueness is not the only norm to judge a logo, as long as it is distinguishable. So, I would still say it makes a good one in context – it does make sense to stake the 2 Ms to create a chair. Everything is ok to me, no evidence of copycat that I can prove.

By: Pascal

Pascal — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:54:01 +0000

Lokks like the boxfresh logo
http://www.boxfresh.co.uk/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Home_2_202

By: DChuck

DChuck — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:11:27 +0000

At first I didn’t see the 2 “M”s but I saw a couch and I thought it was clever… I think I should have kept to my theory.

Not that I don’t see the flow of water… but brownish red is not something that reminds me of it. Blood maybe but not water. I understand color is not all that important, but I think it should have looked better.

I like how the shapes are made thou. it is a rich and classy design. My last complain is: No capitals on names? why? it would maybe have brought the attention to the “M”s in the graphic item.