<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-08-06 &#124; Barbie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/</link>
	<description>Logo Of The Day &#124; Logo Design Inspiration - Daily!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:47:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Theodore</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>Good logo for children and their (grand) parents.
Font and colour are in balance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good logo for children and their (grand) parents.<br />
Font and colour are in balance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik T. Wright</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik T. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>I think more went into this then people are giving it credit for.
Pink: Tells you its for girls.
Script: Tells you its classy and personal, things young girls would look for.
Think Lines: Gives it that child-like appearance.

We also have to take into consideration the conditions this logo needs to be printed on i.e. a tiny plastic bum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think more went into this then people are giving it credit for.<br />
Pink: Tells you its for girls.<br />
Script: Tells you its classy and personal, things young girls would look for.<br />
Think Lines: Gives it that child-like appearance.</p>
<p>We also have to take into consideration the conditions this logo needs to be printed on i.e. a tiny plastic bum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meng</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>I love this one! 
before I did a logo for a Band called &quot;Barbie&amp;The Brats&quot; 
here is the logo : www.coroflot.com/menghui 
Thanks guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this one!<br />
before I did a logo for a Band called &#8220;Barbie&amp;The Brats&#8221;<br />
here is the logo : <a href="http://www.coroflot.com/menghui" rel="nofollow">http://www.coroflot.com/menghui</a><br />
Thanks guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>I think DChuck asked an excellent question. I don&#039;t think branding was the major investment then that it is now. The investment was the advertising which generated the buzz of girls who needed Barbie more than they needed candy. As a result a icon was born and probably influenced 100&#039;s of feminine logos for generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think DChuck asked an excellent question. I don&#8217;t think branding was the major investment then that it is now. The investment was the advertising which generated the buzz of girls who needed Barbie more than they needed candy. As a result a icon was born and probably influenced 100&#8217;s of feminine logos for generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoupi</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4054</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoupi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4054</guid>
		<description>Simple Playful and girly, perfect to represent the iconic doll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple Playful and girly, perfect to represent the iconic doll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBK</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>NBK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>Very Barbie-ish.  I actually think it&#039;s pretty good, probably because I&#039;m so familiar with the logo and associate it to Mattel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Barbie-ish.  I actually think it&#8217;s pretty good, probably because I&#8217;m so familiar with the logo and associate it to Mattel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surialism</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>Surialism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>@DChuck

Without all those investment? a bland, generic with awkward proportion logotype. Like the M tv logo fehfehfeh
Walt Disney&#039;s script is a classic in my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DChuck</p>
<p>Without all those investment? a bland, generic with awkward proportion logotype. Like the M tv logo fehfehfeh<br />
Walt Disney&#8217;s script is a classic in my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4050</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4050</guid>
		<description>Like Dchuck said, a classic logo it is. Definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Dchuck said, a classic logo it is. Definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-08-06-barbie/comment-page-1/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1497#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>Classic, I never thought of this as the logo but it is!

Like MacDo&#039;s logo, money and repetitive marketing campaign made this the classic it is. Without all those investment, would this logo be as recognizable?

I dare to ask!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic, I never thought of this as the logo but it is!</p>
<p>Like MacDo&#8217;s logo, money and repetitive marketing campaign made this the classic it is. Without all those investment, would this logo be as recognizable?</p>
<p>I dare to ask!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
