Very classic in black and white. Nice for printing or web – and the leaf adds just the right touch. I would make the fold of the leaf green to give it just a little depth.
The mark is fantastic. The “pictures” text does not seem coherent with the rest of the logo. I think it has something to do with spacing and positioning. Overall though, very good!
DChuck
Jul 15, 2009 at 1:42 am
I also see a bean pod in the top right part of the G.
I simply love how the leaf was implemented.
@tommyc I think using green would have hurt readability, even if it is a dark green. and using a plain tree would have been cheesy wouldn’t you think?
@DChuck …agreed, i was thinking more on the leaf stem (vein) or perhaps a portion of the text itself in a darker green. I like the b/w as a print alternative, but to not utilize green somewhere for ‘greentree pictures’ would be like creating a logo for “Red Dot Productions” without using red, let alone a dot. Maybe bringing the ‘film’ aspect into the logo a bit more might have been more convincing too…this could just as easily be for a paper factory or a landscape company were it not for the ‘pictures’ text line.
Yeah love it too. I agree with Matt Fouty regarding the spacing issues, but I think that’s more to do with the tight cropping of this thumbnail more than a defect in the logo.
I think this logo design is exemplary. It covers just about everything. It’s unique, memorable, scalable, well balanced, looks great in black and white, demonstrates unity, is clean simple and elegant.
I’d love to see a variation of this in color though.
I think this logo design was definitely well done!
nice, love the implemented leaf. .. but, would using an actual tree and the color green been too simple? …atleast the color green
Very classic in black and white. Nice for printing or web – and the leaf adds just the right touch. I would make the fold of the leaf green to give it just a little depth.
very cool
very cool
I like this logo muchly, ha is that even a word…
The mark is fantastic. The “pictures” text does not seem coherent with the rest of the logo. I think it has something to do with spacing and positioning. Overall though, very good!
I also see a bean pod in the top right part of the G.
I simply love how the leaf was implemented.
@tommyc I think using green would have hurt readability, even if it is a dark green. and using a plain tree would have been cheesy wouldn’t you think?
i think that green will destroy the logo
I like it a lot….
@DChuck …agreed, i was thinking more on the leaf stem (vein) or perhaps a portion of the text itself in a darker green. I like the b/w as a print alternative, but to not utilize green somewhere for ‘greentree pictures’ would be like creating a logo for “Red Dot Productions” without using red, let alone a dot. Maybe bringing the ‘film’ aspect into the logo a bit more might have been more convincing too…this could just as easily be for a paper factory or a landscape company were it not for the ‘pictures’ text line.
Great logo… Love it..
uber cool. now this is one good logo!! though a little color could have done wonders…
Yeah love it too. I agree with Matt Fouty regarding the spacing issues, but I think that’s more to do with the tight cropping of this thumbnail more than a defect in the logo.
Great Job
nice!
arbol verde ,buen trabajo!
[...] This post was Twitted by Turboface [...]
I think this logo design is exemplary. It covers just about everything. It’s unique, memorable, scalable, well balanced, looks great in black and white, demonstrates unity, is clean simple and elegant.
I’d love to see a variation of this in color though.
I think this logo design was definitely well done!