(150 votes, average: 3.04 out of 5)
Logo Of The Day Award Winner:

2009-06-26 | MindBerry


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share


mindberry are based in Vienna, Austria and offer consulting solutions for their clients. They approached me to create a simple branding, preferably not using a berry element. The solution is meant to represent a head with a thought emerging i.e. a mindberry. The colour also gives a subtle hint towards the berry element, using dark blue to represent blue and black berries, purple was to represent red soft fruits and the green to represent a leaf.

Design process.

Credits: David Pache


Related Logos:

8 Comments to “2009-06-26 | MindBerry”

DChuck
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:05 am

I’m not a big fan of the font, but I do like the graphic element a lot!

I think it could hold it’s own on a business card and such material. it is unique and original.

good work


 
Jamie
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:29 am

I’m with DChuck on this one. Nice graphic (and love the colors!) but I’m not a big fan of the font.

There are weird inconsistencies in it that bug me…like the “m” is 2 smooth curves, but the “n” has a stem coming off the top. The “b” has a smooth curve at the bottom, but the “d” has the tail coming off the bottom.


 
Sean
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:32 am

Don’t like it. I don’t think it meets the standard of other logos that have been on this site. The logo and text don’t fit together.


 
EJSchultz
Jun 26, 2009 at 12:40 am

It reminds me of the Audrey II in the Little Shop of Horrors; Feed me Seymour!!!


 
aldur
Jun 26, 2009 at 2:16 am

i like it a lot… though the green thing is hardly to recognize…


 
Léo Renaud-Allaire
Jun 26, 2009 at 6:14 am

Like Jamie said, the font is quite strange and inconsistent. The “m” is making my eyes bleed. But that’s just personnal taste I guess.

The idea of the head/berry thing is quite good though.


 
SuperDave4eva
Jun 26, 2009 at 5:20 pm

I just see a vegetarian pacman…


 
Michel Cabelho
Jun 26, 2009 at 11:09 pm

It’s easily recognizeble and the colors are good but the typeface could be better.


 

Reply