<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-06-09 &#124; Tiffany &amp; Co</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ShanShan</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanShan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not exactly sure what bothered me at first glance...i think that the size of the font is a refine point--maybe it is the &#039;&amp;&#039; that is too big. It doesn&#039;t flow effortlessly. And making is smaller would free up the &#039;Q&#039; issue:) Also making the CO look uppercase or less unequal too may add to the overall flow! It will look lovely on a watch, true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not exactly sure what bothered me at first glance&#8230;i think that the size of the font is a refine point&#8211;maybe it is the &#8216;&amp;&#8217; that is too big. It doesn&#8217;t flow effortlessly. And making is smaller would free up the &#8216;Q&#8217; issue:) Also making the CO look uppercase or less unequal too may add to the overall flow! It will look lovely on a watch, true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperDave4eva</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperDave4eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>I see a T, 8, C and Q... I like the concept but logos that confuse don&#039;t get a high rating from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a T, 8, C and Q&#8230; I like the concept but logos that confuse don&#8217;t get a high rating from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boy Called Out</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3242</link>
		<dc:creator>Boy Called Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3242</guid>
		<description>As a logo, it&#039;s nice... As a lovemark, it&#039;s brilliant! Ha! You could apply a rainbow gradient people would STILL buy into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a logo, it&#8217;s nice&#8230; As a lovemark, it&#8217;s brilliant! Ha! You could apply a rainbow gradient people would STILL buy into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaraKate</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3229</link>
		<dc:creator>SaraKate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3229</guid>
		<description>I love this logo. Simple, classic, enormous range, yet recognizable and easily used for branding. Very elegant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this logo. Simple, classic, enormous range, yet recognizable and easily used for branding. Very elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3224</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3224</guid>
		<description>@Callum
I think it is safe to say we all understood how the art of the &amp; and O come together, it&#039;s just the optical illusion it creates that makes the O look like a Q. Considering the relative similaritude between the two letters, it doesn&#039;t take much to make one look like the other. 

I personally would love to make a suggestion as to how to correct this, since I&#039;m a huge fan of constructive comment, but I just can&#039;t figure it out. This logo has a art style that would be severely impaired by most tries to correct the O-Q situation. I think that&#039;s why people have been noticing the problem but no one has submitted a possible solution.

TL;DR we know why we saw it like that but we still like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Callum<br />
I think it is safe to say we all understood how the art of the &amp; and O come together, it&#8217;s just the optical illusion it creates that makes the O look like a Q. Considering the relative similaritude between the two letters, it doesn&#8217;t take much to make one look like the other. </p>
<p>I personally would love to make a suggestion as to how to correct this, since I&#8217;m a huge fan of constructive comment, but I just can&#8217;t figure it out. This logo has a art style that would be severely impaired by most tries to correct the O-Q situation. I think that&#8217;s why people have been noticing the problem but no one has submitted a possible solution.</p>
<p>TL;DR we know why we saw it like that but we still like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum Chapman</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>p.s. if you pay attention to the lines either side of the &#039;o&#039;, noticing the end of the &#039;&amp;&#039; sign is underneath the &#039;o&#039; eliminates the fact that it looks like a &#039;Q&#039;.. if that made sense :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. if you pay attention to the lines either side of the &#8216;o&#8217;, noticing the end of the &#8216;&amp;&#8217; sign is underneath the &#8216;o&#8217; eliminates the fact that it looks like a &#8216;Q&#8217;.. if that made sense <img src='http://logooftheday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum Chapman</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3216</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3216</guid>
		<description>This one got a 5 from me, elegant, stylish and memorable - perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one got a 5 from me, elegant, stylish and memorable &#8211; perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslam A Memon</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslam A Memon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>I agree wid Daniel Hunninghake here
but i actually started to see the Q only when i read the comment

However its a very nice type mark, really well executed, n i like the font</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wid Daniel Hunninghake here<br />
but i actually started to see the Q only when i read the comment</p>
<p>However its a very nice type mark, really well executed, n i like the font</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>good logo, after reading comments I started seeing the Q instead of the O

Appart from this minor detail, I like it a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good logo, after reading comments I started seeing the Q instead of the O</p>
<p>Appart from this minor detail, I like it a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniela Zeckua</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniela Zeckua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>Nice logo... As Ahmed said, very memorable, but yes... The &quot;O&quot; look like a &quot;Q&quot;.. Anyway, It could work great..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice logo&#8230; As Ahmed said, very memorable, but yes&#8230; The &#8220;O&#8221; look like a &#8220;Q&#8221;.. Anyway, It could work great..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>My eye love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My eye love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>I like it to, but agree with Daniel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it to, but agree with Daniel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Elmasry</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Elmasry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>I like it, very memorable..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it, very memorable..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hunninghake</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3202</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hunninghake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3202</guid>
		<description>At first it&#039;s very appealing. But looking closer, the only complaint I have is that the &quot;O&quot; looks more like a &quot;Q&quot;. Minor point..I like it tho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first it&#8217;s very appealing. But looking closer, the only complaint I have is that the &#8220;O&#8221; looks more like a &#8220;Q&#8221;. Minor point..I like it tho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Schultz</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-06-09-tiffany-co/#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1235#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>Interesting mark - I think it works in the capacity defined above. Could work for branding as people become more aware of the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting mark &#8211; I think it works in the capacity defined above. Could work for branding as people become more aware of the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-02-09 16:07:59 -->
