<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-05-22 &#124; Tenth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/</link>
	<description>Logo Of The Day &#124; Logo Design Inspiration - Daily!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:52:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cerise</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>Hi, I think this logo would look cool if you made the bottom of the dot/little square follow the curve at the top of the T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I think this logo would look cool if you made the bottom of the dot/little square follow the curve at the top of the T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan McGonagill</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2892</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan McGonagill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2892</guid>
		<description>Get black on white. -Guy de Maupassant 
Like where its going, just need that extra little push.. don&#039;t be scared</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get black on white. -Guy de Maupassant<br />
Like where its going, just need that extra little push.. don&#8217;t be scared</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niecey</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>Niecey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>I bet it would look more like a person worshipping, rather than on a cross (as I also had assumed it was), if you brought it in a little at the armpit part of the T, so the sleeves were flared a bit. 

I do like it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet it would look more like a person worshipping, rather than on a cross (as I also had assumed it was), if you brought it in a little at the armpit part of the T, so the sleeves were flared a bit. </p>
<p>I do like it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Allen Smith</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Allen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>Gotham Bold is almost worse than Arial. With Arial, at least I could have assumed that the designer was lazy, but that you looked for a font and deliberately chose this one is a little confounding. Gotham might speak to power and simplicity, but it certainly isn&#039;t a worshipful font. It makes the human figure (which I originally assumed was Christ) look sad or stoic.

Gotham worked for President Obama&#039;s campaign because of the surrounding branding. The logo was lively, the design was clean, and the message was sticky and exciting. For the Tenth wordform, there seems to be no life, no color.

Now, don&#039;t get me wrong, the concept is fantastic. Done right, you can use the worshiper-as-a-t in any number of layouts without being limited by a simple wordform. A branding campaign using this concept could be a homerun, but this logo doesn&#039;t reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotham Bold is almost worse than Arial. With Arial, at least I could have assumed that the designer was lazy, but that you looked for a font and deliberately chose this one is a little confounding. Gotham might speak to power and simplicity, but it certainly isn&#8217;t a worshipful font. It makes the human figure (which I originally assumed was Christ) look sad or stoic.</p>
<p>Gotham worked for President Obama&#8217;s campaign because of the surrounding branding. The logo was lively, the design was clean, and the message was sticky and exciting. For the Tenth wordform, there seems to be no life, no color.</p>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong, the concept is fantastic. Done right, you can use the worshiper-as-a-t in any number of layouts without being limited by a simple wordform. A branding campaign using this concept could be a homerun, but this logo doesn&#8217;t reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2881</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2881</guid>
		<description>That mark is brilliant. The work appears effortless, and that&#039;s part of its beauty and genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That mark is brilliant. The work appears effortless, and that&#8217;s part of its beauty and genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wuht</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>wuht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>I love how simple this mark is. Church logos can be so ugly or typical but I get this right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how simple this mark is. Church logos can be so ugly or typical but I get this right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rds-nltsgrafx</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2878</link>
		<dc:creator>rds-nltsgrafx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2878</guid>
		<description>This is the logo of the day!?Must not be many submissions.I like the fact that its simple and plain but its too simple and plain!
Simple can also be creative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the logo of the day!?Must not be many submissions.I like the fact that its simple and plain but its too simple and plain!<br />
Simple can also be creative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Wu</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments...to respond to some: The typeface is Gotham Bold with some editing to the E. Wanted to avoid historical church cliches as the Tenth community is far from that kind of personality. Square form of the head keeps it looking like a Christian cross vs. a round head that wouldn&#039;t balance out well and look cheap. The notch would be a distraction, unnecessary and hard to reproduce small. It&#039;s not meant to be Jesus or a crossbow at all..it&#039;s a person worshiping, not a crucified or lifeless figure, nor over-the-top joyful. Not meant to be Asian at all nor is the demographic mostly Asian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments&#8230;to respond to some: The typeface is Gotham Bold with some editing to the E. Wanted to avoid historical church cliches as the Tenth community is far from that kind of personality. Square form of the head keeps it looking like a Christian cross vs. a round head that wouldn&#8217;t balance out well and look cheap. The notch would be a distraction, unnecessary and hard to reproduce small. It&#8217;s not meant to be Jesus or a crossbow at all..it&#8217;s a person worshiping, not a crucified or lifeless figure, nor over-the-top joyful. Not meant to be Asian at all nor is the demographic mostly Asian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>I see TENiTH.. or TENiH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see TENiTH.. or TENiH&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum Chapman</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>I agree, simplicity for logos is sometimes best! I quite like the logo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, simplicity for logos is sometimes best! I quite like the logo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Colthart (@bccreative)</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Colthart (@bccreative)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings. On one hand I&#039;m comfortable with it overall, especially if it&#039;s a Christian-type church.I like the suggestion of arms-opened-wide, but I&#039;m not as enthusiastic about the square block/head, because it&#039;s also suggesting a heavy weight that either bowing the crossbar below it, or that crossbar is under tension [like a pulled crossbow] ready to launch the square boulder. I wonder if the tiniest white notch in the middle top of crossbar would help the suggestion of a human and still be a strong cross.

I&#039;m also just a bit distracted by extra letterspace on either side of the cross; it kinda isolates TEN and H.

Push comes to shove though... it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings. On one hand I&#8217;m comfortable with it overall, especially if it&#8217;s a Christian-type church.I like the suggestion of arms-opened-wide, but I&#8217;m not as enthusiastic about the square block/head, because it&#8217;s also suggesting a heavy weight that either bowing the crossbar below it, or that crossbar is under tension [like a pulled crossbow] ready to launch the square boulder. I wonder if the tiniest white notch in the middle top of crossbar would help the suggestion of a human and still be a strong cross.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also just a bit distracted by extra letterspace on either side of the cross; it kinda isolates TEN and H.</p>
<p>Push comes to shove though&#8230; it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson Shold</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson Shold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>Ethan, sometimes simplicity is best.

That said, I think there are other fonts that could better represent a religious aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan, sometimes simplicity is best.</p>
<p>That said, I think there are other fonts that could better represent a religious aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Allen Smith</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2860</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Allen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2860</guid>
		<description>Arial Black for a logo? Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arial Black for a logo? Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-05-22-tenth/comment-page-1/#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1130#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>I get an asian feeling about the second T

I know it is supposed to represent Jesus but I can&#039;t help but feel like it has an asian look to it. Author&#039;s name might help to that feeling too.

Maybe it is done TO look asian since it is in Vancouver BC that has the highest asian immigration % in all of canada... 
I see what they did there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get an asian feeling about the second T</p>
<p>I know it is supposed to represent Jesus but I can&#8217;t help but feel like it has an asian look to it. Author&#8217;s name might help to that feeling too.</p>
<p>Maybe it is done TO look asian since it is in Vancouver BC that has the highest asian immigration % in all of canada&#8230;<br />
I see what they did there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2010-07-30 23:02:39 -->