I agree with DChuck, it’s ok, but it’s not exciting, and i’m not sure about the shape of the wings/eye, i know it’s a simple logo, but it comes across as busy and over worked, if that makes sense.
I would have to agree with DChuck, only I think the concept is good and the execution could have been worked on a bit more.
Conor
May 12, 2009 at 1:13 am
I agree with Paul haha
ESchultz
May 12, 2009 at 1:37 am
I agree with Paul and Chuck – I think there is supposed to be some humor here, but if your clientele does not share the same sense of humor, they may take offense to a logo such as this…
Just something to think about
brian
May 12, 2009 at 1:40 am
feels like they are trying force the concept, instead of just letting it work
It’s a bit forced, like the designer thought I MUST have a bird and an eye in my logo, but the gestalt view is, like Paul said, of a bird ‘flasher’. So it’s a solution but not in a beautiful way. Also we don’t know anything about what this logo is for.
K.
May 12, 2009 at 9:17 pm
I can see a bird and an eye, however it all seems to be too hard! The bird looks dead, crucified with painted on target!
KrazyCeltic
May 13, 2009 at 9:35 am
I see a navel-gazing bird. For the name, I think somehow incorporating some aerial quality into the design would have been interesting to see.
Tareq
May 21, 2009 at 11:34 pm
I dont understand it at all, i feel wierd and scared when i see it, hate it.
big and clunky. half-assed concept, poorly executed. boring type.
yes, its an eye and a bird in one. if that’s as far as the concept went, i could think of 20 other ways to make this look better.
I see the bird, I see the eye but I don’t really like the whole concept.
I give a solid mark to the execution but the concept could have been worked on a little bit more.
I see a bird exposing themselves…
I agree with Dchuck, it also looks old like from the late 80’s early 90’s
very nicely executed, very well thought
–
http://www.aslammemon.com/blog.html
I agree with DChuck, it’s ok, but it’s not exciting, and i’m not sure about the shape of the wings/eye, i know it’s a simple logo, but it comes across as busy and over worked, if that makes sense.
I would have to agree with DChuck, only I think the concept is good and the execution could have been worked on a bit more.
I agree with Paul
haha
I agree with Paul and Chuck – I think there is supposed to be some humor here, but if your clientele does not share the same sense of humor, they may take offense to a logo such as this…
Just something to think about
feels like they are trying force the concept, instead of just letting it work
I agree with @Dchuck. The ratings give all the tell tell signs.
Well, I see a bird holding an eye in it’s beak.. Could be a magpie? People see all kinds of things… depends how you look at it!
looks more like flying squirrel’s eye view.
I’m getting tired of logos with birds in them… and I don’t see any “Logo of the Day” potential here. I like the concept, but that’s about it…
It’s a bit forced, like the designer thought I MUST have a bird and an eye in my logo, but the gestalt view is, like Paul said, of a bird ‘flasher’. So it’s a solution but not in a beautiful way. Also we don’t know anything about what this logo is for.
I can see a bird and an eye, however it all seems to be too hard! The bird looks dead, crucified with painted on target!
I see a navel-gazing bird. For the name, I think somehow incorporating some aerial quality into the design would have been interesting to see.
I dont understand it at all, i feel wierd and scared when i see it, hate it.
big and clunky. half-assed concept, poorly executed. boring type.
yes, its an eye and a bird in one. if that’s as far as the concept went, i could think of 20 other ways to make this look better.
i don’t get it.