Comments on: 2009-05-04 | Voidfabric

By: boxerdude

boxerdude — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:23:44 +0000

i agree wholeheartedly with DChuck in that the logo/name would work better for a garment company…. as a design/coding studio not only do i find the name ridiculous but the logo is equally as ineffective.

not that we’re here to judge or comment on the names of the businesses, but this falls into the category of wineries in australia and new zealand using names like “4 emus” and “cat pee on a gooseberry bush”, “painted turtle” etc… nonsense names that do nothing to spark a brand. they remain an awkward logo.

By: ArturDZGN

ArturDZGN — Wed, 13 May 2009 11:46:08 +0000

in fact its so complex it has no reading.

By: WhatBradDidNext

WhatBradDidNext — Mon, 11 May 2009 12:28:14 +0000

Agree, difficult to read but as it is also a long phrase it doesn’t have a memorable shape / outline even without immediately understanding the text

By: Dennis

Dennis — Tue, 05 May 2009 16:30:58 +0000

Thanks all.

By: Ayham

Ayham — Mon, 04 May 2009 19:41:40 +0000

hard to read

By: Jamie

Jamie — Mon, 04 May 2009 14:58:13 +0000

I agree with the comment about the first “i”. I first read this logo as “voRd fabric” so the dot would help with legibility, plus it would go a long way with consistency since the “i” in fabric is dotted too.

Other than that, the logo’s okay…not my style, but I do like all the ligatures.

By: DChuck

DChuck — Mon, 04 May 2009 12:56:26 +0000

would work for some Hip gangsta sweater company… not so much for a design and programing firm.

in and of itself, it is not bad… just a very poor choice for its use.

By: Shawn G. Strong

Shawn G. Strong — Mon, 04 May 2009 03:16:08 +0000

I can read it but I don’t like it. I don’t feel like it conveys anything.

By: tuwidesign.com

tuwidesign.com — Sun, 03 May 2009 22:57:11 +0000

yeah.. too difficult to read it…
not so fresh also…

By: Devlin

Devlin — Sun, 03 May 2009 21:02:25 +0000

I agree with everyone, it’s a cool idea, but for a logo it’s to hard to read.

By: James Hsu

James Hsu — Sun, 03 May 2009 20:23:17 +0000

I also had difficulty reading the logo,
I do however like the ligatures, however legibility
is definitely taking value away from this logomark.

By: Nikhil

Nikhil — Sun, 03 May 2009 18:06:55 +0000

I got fabric but not void…..

By: rozariojoseph

rozariojoseph — Sun, 03 May 2009 17:35:32 +0000

I agreed with
Torrie Foster

By: Torrie Foster

Torrie Foster — Sun, 03 May 2009 14:52:06 +0000

Like the font, but it is hard to read.

By: Paul Randall

Paul Randall — Sun, 03 May 2009 14:46:06 +0000

I think the logo could be improved by adding a ‘tittle’ to the first I.

By: Rahul

Rahul — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:35:30 +0000

agreed with most of the ppl… very hard to read

By: Aslam A Memon

Aslam A Memon — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:27:08 +0000

hmmm quite difficult to read thou i like the bg texture

By: twe4ked

twe4ked — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:20:21 +0000

soz to double post, had another look and i think a dot above the first i would go a long way

By: twe4ked

twe4ked — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:17:54 +0000

agreed, to hard to read.

By: Bry

Bry — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:11:32 +0000

Very difficult to read this logo, ineffective I think.