<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-04-28 &#124; Fabric Lab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maff the Logo Designer</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>Maff the Logo Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>I too like the way the logo has been cut at the angle and that you can still read the type easily. Just need to refine the scissors a little and it would be perfect. Really like the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too like the way the logo has been cut at the angle and that you can still read the type easily. Just need to refine the scissors a little and it would be perfect. Really like the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajjad Haider</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajjad Haider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>DChuck:

Good at-last you agree at some point... thanks

Hope Celeste Prevost wont mind, even thou its his thing, and I have no intentions to copy it. Just showing my point of view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DChuck:</p>
<p>Good at-last you agree at some point&#8230; thanks</p>
<p>Hope Celeste Prevost wont mind, even thou its his thing, and I have no intentions to copy it. Just showing my point of view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2435</guid>
		<description>some reason my comment wouldnt post so....

do you really need to have scissors? What if you made the dotted line thread a line to represent a needle. To me the scissors make it distracting.

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/3209/whatabout.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some reason my comment wouldnt post so&#8230;.</p>
<p>do you really need to have scissors? What if you made the dotted line thread a line to represent a needle. To me the scissors make it distracting.</p>
<p><a href="http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/3209/whatabout.png" rel="nofollow">http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/3209/whatabout.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>@Sajjad
I like your second one better. It kinda represents what I was saying about physics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sajjad<br />
I like your second one better. It kinda represents what I was saying about physics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>Nice logo.........
Great scissors........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice logo&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Great scissors&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook versus Twitter and Why They Should Remain Separate &#124; BrianYerkes.com</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook versus Twitter and Why They Should Remain Separate &#124; BrianYerkes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>[...] him on Twitter? And if they don&#8217;t follow him on Twitter do they really want to know about the logo of the day everyday? (p.s. I think Jacob Cass is an awesome guy, just using him as an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] him on Twitter? And if they don&#8217;t follow him on Twitter do they really want to know about the logo of the day everyday? (p.s. I think Jacob Cass is an awesome guy, just using him as an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajjad Haider</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajjad Haider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>What do you think about this one…

http://www.twitpic.com/461ql</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about this one…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitpic.com/461ql" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitpic.com/461ql</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajjad Haider</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajjad Haider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>@DChuck

Thanks for reading my review and the comment.

But I dont think there is any contradiction, let me show you how I see this logo (please dont mind the scissor, &quot;it is from the wingding font&quot;)

http://www.twitpic.com/460sg

Thanks, hope it is clear now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DChuck</p>
<p>Thanks for reading my review and the comment.</p>
<p>But I dont think there is any contradiction, let me show you how I see this logo (please dont mind the scissor, &#8220;it is from the wingding font&#8221;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitpic.com/460sg" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitpic.com/460sg</a></p>
<p>Thanks, hope it is clear now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>I like the concept. What would make this successful (along the lines of what others have mentioned):

the scissors should be bigger. Significantly bigger. More importantly, the top half of the scissors should be hidden underneath the cut. After all, how is it possible to cut through fabric without having part of the scissors behind the other side of the fabric? Having the scissors exposed at the bottom rather than the top will and a nice visual counter to the active top half of the logo.

I would also assume that, if the logo is supposed to communicate fabric in the process of being cut (as opposed to an already cut piece of fabric), the cut line would end at the pivot of the scissors. Otherwise, how is it possible for the scissors to cut ahead of itself? I believe that showing a cut in process is much more dynamic that having a completed cut. It implies action, that something is happening right now that you may not want to miss.

There is really no argument about the scissors looking like clipart. A bold, simple and iconic scissors graphic is a natural pairing with iconic and timeless Helvetica that is used in the logo. Anything too stylized would be out of place. And like James said, any graphic representation of a pair of scissors (or any object, really) is likely to have some resemblance to clipart. That doesn&#039;t mean that it is automatically bad.

This logo has the potential to be stellar... but it isn&#039;t there yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept. What would make this successful (along the lines of what others have mentioned):</p>
<p>the scissors should be bigger. Significantly bigger. More importantly, the top half of the scissors should be hidden underneath the cut. After all, how is it possible to cut through fabric without having part of the scissors behind the other side of the fabric? Having the scissors exposed at the bottom rather than the top will and a nice visual counter to the active top half of the logo.</p>
<p>I would also assume that, if the logo is supposed to communicate fabric in the process of being cut (as opposed to an already cut piece of fabric), the cut line would end at the pivot of the scissors. Otherwise, how is it possible for the scissors to cut ahead of itself? I believe that showing a cut in process is much more dynamic that having a completed cut. It implies action, that something is happening right now that you may not want to miss.</p>
<p>There is really no argument about the scissors looking like clipart. A bold, simple and iconic scissors graphic is a natural pairing with iconic and timeless Helvetica that is used in the logo. Anything too stylized would be out of place. And like James said, any graphic representation of a pair of scissors (or any object, really) is likely to have some resemblance to clipart. That doesn&#8217;t mean that it is automatically bad.</p>
<p>This logo has the potential to be stellar&#8230; but it isn&#8217;t there yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>Sajjad, 2 of your points contradict each other.

if the bottom half of the scissors is hidden, it means that they are in the process of cutting, so the line should continue after to indicate that they are not done.

If the line ends at the scissors, they are done cutting and the bottom part of the paper fell off, reveiling the bottom part of the scissors.

basic physics really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sajjad, 2 of your points contradict each other.</p>
<p>if the bottom half of the scissors is hidden, it means that they are in the process of cutting, so the line should continue after to indicate that they are not done.</p>
<p>If the line ends at the scissors, they are done cutting and the bottom part of the paper fell off, reveiling the bottom part of the scissors.</p>
<p>basic physics really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajjad Haider Syed</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajjad Haider Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>very nice idea... BUT....

as few fellows have already noticed - Scissors  -

- first of all it is very cliparty kind of...
- secondly it is smaller in size
- thirdly it should be half cut as well, not placed over the line like this
- fourth line should stop until the scissor, it should not continue after scissor...

this all for now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice idea&#8230; BUT&#8230;.</p>
<p>as few fellows have already noticed &#8211; Scissors  -</p>
<p>- first of all it is very cliparty kind of&#8230;<br />
- secondly it is smaller in size<br />
- thirdly it should be half cut as well, not placed over the line like this<br />
- fourth line should stop until the scissor, it should not continue after scissor&#8230;</p>
<p>this all for now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hsu</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to disagree with a few people, and say that I feel this is a clever, and successful logomark as is. The issue whether or not the scissors look like clip-art is completely subjective, can a silhouette of scissors &#039;not look like&#039; clip art? Personally, I don&#039;t feel like the scissors should be hidden; I say this because would anybody really see a 1 armed scissor blade and think &quot;Oh! Scissors!&quot; I feel that it would create more of a disconnect and should stay as is.

My only concern/issue is the bottom portion of the C, as I am disturbed by the lower half peeping up over the cut line. My suggestion: raise the cut line and cut it off completely, or expose more of the letter forms. 

My $0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to disagree with a few people, and say that I feel this is a clever, and successful logomark as is. The issue whether or not the scissors look like clip-art is completely subjective, can a silhouette of scissors &#8216;not look like&#8217; clip art? Personally, I don&#8217;t feel like the scissors should be hidden; I say this because would anybody really see a 1 armed scissor blade and think &#8220;Oh! Scissors!&#8221; I feel that it would create more of a disconnect and should stay as is.</p>
<p>My only concern/issue is the bottom portion of the C, as I am disturbed by the lower half peeping up over the cut line. My suggestion: raise the cut line and cut it off completely, or expose more of the letter forms. </p>
<p>My $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QF</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>QF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>I like this very much, would like it even better without the scissors - GIVE THEM THE SNIP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this very much, would like it even better without the scissors &#8211; GIVE THEM THE SNIP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>bottom part of the scisors shoulw be hidden. Maybe if the scisors weren&#039;t directly from some clip art it would make the whole logo feel more unique

Great concept, I like how the cut line was made and how the bottom part is missing.

come to think of it, if the bottom part of the scisors is hidden, it means the material is still attached, meaning there should still be the bottom part. All in all, the bottom part of the scisors needed to be present to show that the cut is finished. Problem is, the cut line continues, indicating that there is still some more to cut through... Ow my head...

Needs a little more work, but there is something there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bottom part of the scisors shoulw be hidden. Maybe if the scisors weren&#8217;t directly from some clip art it would make the whole logo feel more unique</p>
<p>Great concept, I like how the cut line was made and how the bottom part is missing.</p>
<p>come to think of it, if the bottom part of the scisors is hidden, it means the material is still attached, meaning there should still be the bottom part. All in all, the bottom part of the scisors needed to be present to show that the cut is finished. Problem is, the cut line continues, indicating that there is still some more to cut through&#8230; Ow my head&#8230;</p>
<p>Needs a little more work, but there is something there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperDave4eva</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperDave4eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement with the clip art comments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement with the clip art comments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogdoy</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>dogdoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>Cut off? Is it ok, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut off? Is it ok, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Randall</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>Agree entirely with Tom. The scissors look like they have come straight from ClipArt. I may have tried to create a 3D effect by hiding 1 side of the scissors.

Other than that, I like the cutoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree entirely with Tom. The scissors look like they have come straight from ClipArt. I may have tried to create a 3D effect by hiding 1 side of the scissors.</p>
<p>Other than that, I like the cutoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>Those scissors would not reproduce well if the logo is reduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those scissors would not reproduce well if the logo is reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-04-28-fabric-lab/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=1000#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>I like how the type looks cut off. I&#039;m just not a fan of the scissors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how the type looks cut off. I&#8217;m just not a fan of the scissors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-02-09 16:17:47 -->
