Comments on: 2009-04-05 | Kim Seidl

By: Valerie

Valerie — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:03:58 +0000

I like it, looks very upscale to me and I can easily see it printed in a modern classy way on the back of an invite or something. Great job!

By: jen capone

jen capone — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:46:54 +0000

(congrats ellen!)

By: Ellen Petty

Ellen Petty — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:51:28 +0000

Nikhil, Cynthia and twe4ked, thank you for your kind words. The logo is spelled correctly, the entry was just misspelled.

By: DChuck

DChuck — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:04:36 +0000

The Logo has its merits but it has its flaws too.

it says high class and charm when you look at it, which are good quality for a wedding photographer.
but it is very generic and unremarkable. which are bad when you are in a competitive business.

3/5 at best for me.

By: Brian Cassidy

Brian Cassidy — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:09:21 +0000

@twe4ked Well said. I also thought his comment was a bit immature.

This logo is not the greatest. It has a bit of a clip art feel to it. The K&S cut out in the box is to thin and abstract to read as a K&S. Also the text is to thin to balance well with the bold graphic. I don’t think this logo would make it onto a worst logos list, but I’m having a hard time finding something nice to say about it.

By: Fogra

Fogra — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:37:14 +0000

^ I have to agree. Most submissions are unremarkable.

By: penflare

penflare — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:58:43 +0000

the logos on the site lately have been par at best..

By: Cynthia

Cynthia — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:16:28 +0000

I really like this logo. It looks exquisite and upscale.
Btw, we’re critiquing designs here, not grammer.

By: Gemma

Gemma — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:43:27 +0000

I personally don’t like how thin the text is. It says more ‘tech’ to me and doesn’t balance well with the weight of the black cube above it.

The flower in the logo doesn’t really communicate ‘wedding’ to me either – more ‘interior designer’. And the swooshes on the left leave me wondering whether I’m supposed to see letters or whether they are simply abstract decoration.

By: twe4ked

twe4ked — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:42:37 +0000

@jesse

Try thinking before you comment. Did u stop to think that English might be his second language? He could also be simply tired, its a comment on a logo and even though it didn’t give much back to the community it was better than your comment where you took time to point out someone else’s flaws. Do you feel good about yourself?

By: twe4ked

twe4ked — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:39:35 +0000

Nice logo, but is it just me or is the ‘e’ missing?

also I think the ‘l’ looks out of place. I actual logo is great though.

By: Jesse

Jesse — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:42:52 +0000

Hey Rahul,
I think you should check your grammar before you comment.
“Much more” is redundant. Thanks

By: Rahul

Rahul — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:29:57 +0000

I believe this logo could be much more better.

By: Nikhil

Nikhil — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:16:36 +0000

Is there K & S in the logo(above the name)?
Logo is looking really rich.