<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-03-29 &#124; Sugar Cult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Really nice type treatment. I really like the printed materials.

YAY I like a logo posted on this site. Run for the hills. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice type treatment. I really like the printed materials.</p>
<p>YAY I like a logo posted on this site. Run for the hills. <img src='http://logooftheday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camille</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>Camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>Like DChuck, I too am not fond of logos like this. They look untidy and haphazard. I&#039;ve seen logos with a clean and cheery look that use a style reminiscent of a child writing with a crayon, but this logo isn&#039;t one of them.

I see a lot of the commenters like this logo and have remarked on how well the packaging works with it. For the store&#039;s sake I hope so; I personally would look at packaging with this logo and think &quot;I sure hope whatever the store put inside the package looks better than their logo!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like DChuck, I too am not fond of logos like this. They look untidy and haphazard. I&#8217;ve seen logos with a clean and cheery look that use a style reminiscent of a child writing with a crayon, but this logo isn&#8217;t one of them.</p>
<p>I see a lot of the commenters like this logo and have remarked on how well the packaging works with it. For the store&#8217;s sake I hope so; I personally would look at packaging with this logo and think &#8220;I sure hope whatever the store put inside the package looks better than their logo!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not the biggest fan of the concept. All this looks too raw, unrefined and to an extent; dirty. 

Those things don&#039;t come to my mind when I think about a handmade candy store.

the childish style is correct, candy brings us to our childhood. I just think it could have had a more clean &quot;chinese ink paint writing&quot; look instead of the dirty crayon style.

at least that&#039;s how I wouldve done it, it doesn&#039;t mean that it THE way to do it. Plus, the client baught it if I read the text correctly, so it must have some merit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not the biggest fan of the concept. All this looks too raw, unrefined and to an extent; dirty. </p>
<p>Those things don&#8217;t come to my mind when I think about a handmade candy store.</p>
<p>the childish style is correct, candy brings us to our childhood. I just think it could have had a more clean &#8220;chinese ink paint writing&#8221; look instead of the dirty crayon style.</p>
<p>at least that&#8217;s how I wouldve done it, it doesn&#8217;t mean that it THE way to do it. Plus, the client baught it if I read the text correctly, so it must have some merit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajjad Haider Syed</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajjad Haider Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>ok... overall the logo is not bad... but (I hate this but specially when it is from the client, any how)

in your packaging there is one serious problem I see your BG corporate color is purple... where as on the box / bag &amp; T-shirt it appears as brown... which makes your corporate look a bit weak... (it might be only in the picture)

Second main concern is that on business card you wont read the line &quot;Love for good&quot; cause your main lettering is just too big when compared to the tag line, or else you find some better / creative way to come over it...

any how... well-done... its not bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok&#8230; overall the logo is not bad&#8230; but (I hate this but specially when it is from the client, any how)</p>
<p>in your packaging there is one serious problem I see your BG corporate color is purple&#8230; where as on the box / bag &amp; T-shirt it appears as brown&#8230; which makes your corporate look a bit weak&#8230; (it might be only in the picture)</p>
<p>Second main concern is that on business card you wont read the line &#8220;Love for good&#8221; cause your main lettering is just too big when compared to the tag line, or else you find some better / creative way to come over it&#8230;</p>
<p>any how&#8230; well-done&#8230; its not bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperDave4eva</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperDave4eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>The wonderful packaging aside (nice job), I don&#039;t find this logo to be that spectacular. The arrangement of the letters seems a bit haphazard. Although I admit this logo feels playful, to me it looks somewhat unprofessional. Thankfully the brilliant packaging makes up the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wonderful packaging aside (nice job), I don&#8217;t find this logo to be that spectacular. The arrangement of the letters seems a bit haphazard. Although I admit this logo feels playful, to me it looks somewhat unprofessional. Thankfully the brilliant packaging makes up the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>I agree with cody, well done on the packaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with cody, well done on the packaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Marie</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a little more competitive research, because this has a lot of the same feelings as the identity for haute chocolatier Vosges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a little more competitive research, because this has a lot of the same feelings as the identity for haute chocolatier Vosges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Jensen</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t like it until I saw it in use on the stationary and boxes. Now I think it&#039;s cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t like it until I saw it in use on the stationary and boxes. Now I think it&#8217;s cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-29-sugar-cult/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=862#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>Nice Logo!
Especially the SUG of sugar is looking good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Logo!<br />
Especially the SUG of sugar is looking good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-02-09 16:25:29 -->
