<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-03-26 &#124; Avecs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SuperDave4eva</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperDave4eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=764#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really like the idea of having to explain a design for people to &quot;get it&quot;... especially for a design company. Also, what is with modifying the &#039;v&#039;? I think it was just an unnecessary gesture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really like the idea of having to explain a design for people to &#8220;get it&#8221;&#8230; especially for a design company. Also, what is with modifying the &#8216;v&#8217;? I think it was just an unnecessary gesture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPhelps</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>TPhelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=764#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>To be the &quot;eye&quot; makes me think more of the Blender logo than an eye. That or I see a &quot;d&quot; in the negative space. Other than that, I like this logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be the &#8220;eye&#8221; makes me think more of the Blender logo than an eye. That or I see a &#8220;d&#8221; in the negative space. Other than that, I like this logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJSchultz</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>EJSchultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=764#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Kern that text, son! The image (to me anyway) does not come off as an eye, let alone an eye for detail. Looks like Logo Class 101 to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kern that text, son! The image (to me anyway) does not come off as an eye, let alone an eye for detail. Looks like Logo Class 101 to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=764#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>I agree with DChuck about the spacing between symbol and the name.. 
Although the eye is eye catching...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with DChuck about the spacing between symbol and the name..<br />
Although the eye is eye catching&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2009-03-25-avecs/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=764#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>the font is nice. Althou the lettering and the graphic item seem to be two seperate things. They are far and the name overwhelms the graphic. I had a feeling of &quot;page loading&quot; for the graphic item and I&#039;m not a fan of the concept of it being an abstract eye. 

good job on making the company name unique thou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the font is nice. Althou the lettering and the graphic item seem to be two seperate things. They are far and the name overwhelms the graphic. I had a feeling of &#8220;page loading&#8221; for the graphic item and I&#8217;m not a fan of the concept of it being an abstract eye. </p>
<p>good job on making the company name unique thou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-02-09 14:31:34 -->
