Comments on: 2009-02-20 | Sit

By: ??????????????????????? | Quarter

??????????????????????? | Quarter — Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:37:38 +0000

[...] Sit [...]

By: Dalius Stuoka

Dalius Stuoka — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:32:16 +0000

Thanks for the feedback guys! I really appreciate

By: Phil

Phil — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:01:54 +0000

I really like the logo, but I’ll have to agree on the “I” problem. Since it’s in-between, the horizontal bar on the top almost makes it read more like “STI.”

I’m no professional, but I wonder what would happen if you did something to the I to make it not just straight up and down, like take notches out of it or curve it inwards or something. Or wait, if I look realllly close am I hallucinating when I see a little nip out of it? I might try exaggerating that a bit more (or just ignore this if I’m simply insane.)

Possibly even make an ornamental cut out of the horizontal bar to dot the “i.” Though, I wouldn’t suggest that. I like the simplicity the logo holds right now.

By: SuperDave4eva

SuperDave4eva — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:42:49 +0000

The ‘i’ is definitely the main culprit in this one. I think a little more work on it would make the ‘i’ more clear to the eyes, and give this logo what it needs for standing applause!

By: Eric Blair

Eric Blair — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:30:12 +0000

Subtleties are nice, but I feel like with a logo, it’s important to communicate the name. To have a subtle element like the FedEx arrow offers a nice “A ha!” moment, but whether people see it or not doesn’t affect the name recognition. It’s a whole ‘nother story when the subtlety is the name.

I like it, it’s a good idea, but I think it needs to read more clearly.

By: AdnElric

AdnElric — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:18:08 +0000

“Conceptual logo, a rendered chair with a _hidden_ word ’sit’.”

It is actually supposed to be hidden.

I like it just the way it is… not to visible, not too hidden.

By: James Hsu

James Hsu — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:04:48 +0000

I rather enjoy the subtlety. In the words of David Hylton: it’s all about the subtleties.

By: Chich

Chich — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:16:05 +0000

‘SIT’ could definitely be more pronounced.
A worthy addition to LOTD.

By: Alex

Alex — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:36:51 +0000

I like the concept. Maybe sit could have been brought out more with a different angle on the chair.

By: brian

brian — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:18:12 +0000

it took me far too long to realize where sit was… I hardly can make out the i… the overall image is a lil blurry which is making it hard to read as well.

Good idea, and would be good for a rough, but not a final piece

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:38:29 +0000

What about putting ‘SIT’ in a different color? I think that would be the icing on the cake.

By: QF

QF — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:14:08 +0000

Weirdly enough, I think I’d prefer this if it didn’t say SIT. If it was just a chair.

By: DChuck

DChuck — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:22:22 +0000

I like it. I saw the hidden word.
Then again I saw that the logo was called sit! but I saw it before reading that the word was hidden which gives it points.

It could have standed out a little more thou

All in all, solid logo, could use some more work.

By: Turulcsirip - Tamas Bogdan

Turulcsirip - Tamas Bogdan — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:42:22 +0000

[...] @justcreative: Logo Of The Day: 2009-02-20 | Sit http://logooftheday.com/2009-02-18-sit/ « el?z? | Tamas Bogdan — 2009. 02. 19. [...]

By: Kristin Andrews

Kristin Andrews — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:33:21 +0000

I agree with Paul that it’s clever. I also agree with Conor in that the lettering needs to be more dramatic as it doesn’t stand out enough to get it right away. I wonder what it would look like with a shorter chair back?

By: Cristhian Bedon

Cristhian Bedon — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:33:07 +0000

Maybe if the “SIT” stood out abit more, that’s is my only suggestion. The concept is a good one though.

By: Roy Nottage

Roy Nottage — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:32:16 +0000

I like it, though I didn’t get it until I read the quote underneath. Think it is because of the ‘i’ being quite subtle. Does it matter that I didn’t get it?

By: Conor

Conor — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:29:16 +0000

Interesting! Not very clear though, if Sit wasnt all over the page I probably wouldn’t have gotten it. It’s better than the sex toys one at least! lol

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:28:53 +0000

A clever idea. I imagine it would be for a furniture company or something