<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008-12-20 &#124; Ship Spotting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Inspiration, Gallery &#38; Award Scheme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-10564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-10564</guid>
		<description>i see two light bulb sockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see two light bulb sockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DChuck</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>DChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I like it. For a little while I was wondering if both part of the binocular were supposed to represent &quot;S&quot; back to back but that&#039;s a bit far.

I never saw two men boxing thou. I saw binoculars and a ship and then I started reading. 

Give this logo some developpement time and it will be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. For a little while I was wondering if both part of the binocular were supposed to represent &#8220;S&#8221; back to back but that&#8217;s a bit far.</p>
<p>I never saw two men boxing thou. I saw binoculars and a ship and then I started reading. </p>
<p>Give this logo some developpement time and it will be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-485</guid>
		<description>ha ha, deja vu! This looks incredibly similar to an early concept for a logo I just finished. Even down to the name and industry. http://tinyurl.com/9kqrvv Some people saw a boat in the negative space, another a sand bucket, etc. Overall we decided the logo wasn&#039;t that effective and went another direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha, deja vu! This looks incredibly similar to an early concept for a logo I just finished. Even down to the name and industry. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/9kqrvv" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/9kqrvv</a> Some people saw a boat in the negative space, another a sand bucket, etc. Overall we decided the logo wasn&#8217;t that effective and went another direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Wow! I was really surprised to see my logo on here. It was just a quick concept thrown together without too much thought really. Thanks to everyone for their honest feedback too though. I do realise that the overall concept doesn&#039;t work especially when the ship isn&#039;t completely obvious. Thanks Kevin for your support. I take no offense from Mitch&#039;s comment either.

Kind Regards,

Sean O&#039;Grady (Fogra)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I was really surprised to see my logo on here. It was just a quick concept thrown together without too much thought really. Thanks to everyone for their honest feedback too though. I do realise that the overall concept doesn&#8217;t work especially when the ship isn&#8217;t completely obvious. Thanks Kevin for your support. I take no offense from Mitch&#8217;s comment either.</p>
<p>Kind Regards,</p>
<p>Sean O&#8217;Grady (Fogra)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-312</guid>
		<description>I agree with QF regarding flattening out the top of the + in the center -- that would make the smokestacks of the ship better seen.  Also, to give it a more modern feel, round out some of the flattened joints.. or maybe round out just the ship to make it stick out more.. 

It is a neat concept though, and even the designer noted that it needed work, so it&#039;s obviously not a finished product as is.  I&#039;d love to see it again after a few revisions. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with QF regarding flattening out the top of the + in the center &#8212; that would make the smokestacks of the ship better seen.  Also, to give it a more modern feel, round out some of the flattened joints.. or maybe round out just the ship to make it stick out more.. </p>
<p>It is a neat concept though, and even the designer noted that it needed work, so it&#8217;s obviously not a finished product as is.  I&#8217;d love to see it again after a few revisions. <img src='http://logooftheday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QF</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>QF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Kevin,
Not all criticism can be perfectly constructive or constructed, and while calling it a &quot;mess&quot; might have been a comment best left inside Mitch&#039;s head, suggesting two or three more rounds of revisions is perfectly reasonable advice. Designers, like anyone working publicly in a creative field, make ourselves vulnerable, on a personal level. We do so by choice. If a designer can&#039;t take some blunt criticism, they should not be submitting work to showcase/review sites such as this. Anyway...

I only ended up seeing the ship because I knew I was supposed to be seeing something. It took a few seconds. And when I did see it, it didn&#039;t strike me a particularly lifelike ship. The frustrating part is that this logo could have worked quite well - there&#039;s no reason why the ship couldn&#039;t look better and the binoculars slightly less intrusive. 

A good start would be simplifying the relative complexity of the eyepieces, and perhaps eliminating the reflected chimney stacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />
Not all criticism can be perfectly constructive or constructed, and while calling it a &#8220;mess&#8221; might have been a comment best left inside Mitch&#8217;s head, suggesting two or three more rounds of revisions is perfectly reasonable advice. Designers, like anyone working publicly in a creative field, make ourselves vulnerable, on a personal level. We do so by choice. If a designer can&#8217;t take some blunt criticism, they should not be submitting work to showcase/review sites such as this. Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>I only ended up seeing the ship because I knew I was supposed to be seeing something. It took a few seconds. And when I did see it, it didn&#8217;t strike me a particularly lifelike ship. The frustrating part is that this logo could have worked quite well &#8211; there&#8217;s no reason why the ship couldn&#8217;t look better and the binoculars slightly less intrusive. </p>
<p>A good start would be simplifying the relative complexity of the eyepieces, and perhaps eliminating the reflected chimney stacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Kevin,
You&#039;re right, allow me to clarify.
I was referring to what everyone&#039;s interpretation of the logo was and can see how it could be read differently.
Upon reflection it was a poor choice of words...

To re-explain...by two or three more rounds i mean, i believe that the concept of using negative space is interesting in brands and is starting to work well here but as illustrated in the comments it needs some further development to tighten the message, i.e. two or three more rounds of changes...

Further to your point re feelings being hurt i can understand your critique of my comments for not being useful, (fair point i hope my explanation cleared that up) certainly wasn&#039;t my intention to tear anyones designs apart, but we are all grown ups we should be able to take it...and after having quickly reviewed &quot;Fogra&#039;s&quot;  work i can see he/she is clearly a well experienced designer who hopefully saw through the clumsy wording of my throwaway comment or didn&#039;t read it at all.

This is a prime example of how written communication can easily be taken out of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,<br />
You&#8217;re right, allow me to clarify.<br />
I was referring to what everyone&#8217;s interpretation of the logo was and can see how it could be read differently.<br />
Upon reflection it was a poor choice of words&#8230;</p>
<p>To re-explain&#8230;by two or three more rounds i mean, i believe that the concept of using negative space is interesting in brands and is starting to work well here but as illustrated in the comments it needs some further development to tighten the message, i.e. two or three more rounds of changes&#8230;</p>
<p>Further to your point re feelings being hurt i can understand your critique of my comments for not being useful, (fair point i hope my explanation cleared that up) certainly wasn&#8217;t my intention to tear anyones designs apart, but we are all grown ups we should be able to take it&#8230;and after having quickly reviewed &#8220;Fogra&#8217;s&#8221;  work i can see he/she is clearly a well experienced designer who hopefully saw through the clumsy wording of my throwaway comment or didn&#8217;t read it at all.</p>
<p>This is a prime example of how written communication can easily be taken out of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patareco</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Patareco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Has a lot of different views to it! Plugs, ship, binoculars, 2 guys boxing! WooWoow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has a lot of different views to it! Plugs, ship, binoculars, 2 guys boxing! WooWoow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-306</guid>
		<description>^ I think it&#039;s good to have a healthy and light hearted discussion about a logo, but to call someone&#039;s work &quot;a mess&quot; is simply bad manners.

I was once mentored by a designer who had done marketing work for Coca Cola, a company whose products are universally recognizable.

She taught me that you should never attack or insult a designer&#039;s work. Instead, you should only give constructive advice, and you should also never say anything that could be hurtful. No good can come of that.

If you&#039;re hurting someone&#039;s feelings, you&#039;re not doing a very good job as a critic. There is a helpful and friendly way to say everything.

When you have something negative to say, you should counter with positive recommendations on how something can be improved. Remove negative terms from your vocabulary and replace them with helpful terms.

Saying something needs &quot;two or three more rounds&quot; gets you nowhere. It is not helpful, it is not intelligent or insightful. You&#039;re really just embarrassing yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ I think it&#8217;s good to have a healthy and light hearted discussion about a logo, but to call someone&#8217;s work &#8220;a mess&#8221; is simply bad manners.</p>
<p>I was once mentored by a designer who had done marketing work for Coca Cola, a company whose products are universally recognizable.</p>
<p>She taught me that you should never attack or insult a designer&#8217;s work. Instead, you should only give constructive advice, and you should also never say anything that could be hurtful. No good can come of that.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re hurting someone&#8217;s feelings, you&#8217;re not doing a very good job as a critic. There is a helpful and friendly way to say everything.</p>
<p>When you have something negative to say, you should counter with positive recommendations on how something can be improved. Remove negative terms from your vocabulary and replace them with helpful terms.</p>
<p>Saying something needs &#8220;two or three more rounds&#8221; gets you nowhere. It is not helpful, it is not intelligent or insightful. You&#8217;re really just embarrassing yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-301</guid>
		<description>aghhhh what a mess. Great concept but clearly needs two or three more rounds of development to clear up the message and the graphic needs to be more contempory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aghhhh what a mess. Great concept but clearly needs two or three more rounds of development to clear up the message and the graphic needs to be more contempory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-300</guid>
		<description>I also saw two men boxing first.  Then the binoculars.  Then the ship, but it would have never jumped out at me.  I like the cleverness behind it, but overall its just ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also saw two men boxing first.  Then the binoculars.  Then the ship, but it would have never jumped out at me.  I like the cleverness behind it, but overall its just ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-299</guid>
		<description>When I first saw this I saw the two men boxing as well. Then I saw the binoculars, next the ship, the the plugs, and then the chess piece and the legos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first saw this I saw the two men boxing as well. Then I saw the binoculars, next the ship, the the plugs, and then the chess piece and the legos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Leys</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Leys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-298</guid>
		<description>I see two man boxing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see two man boxing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emiloly</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Emiloly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-297</guid>
		<description>lol! I see the plugs too now!! (And then the ships disappeared heh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol! I see the plugs too now!! (And then the ships disappeared heh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-296</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine, who never comments on blogs looked at it and said, &quot;I see two male electrical plugs trying to work things out ... not going to happen!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine, who never comments on blogs looked at it and said, &#8220;I see two male electrical plugs trying to work things out &#8230; not going to happen!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-294</guid>
		<description>I also see a rook from a chessboard and a lego, but that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also see a rook from a chessboard and a lego, but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Cass</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-292</guid>
		<description>In between the binoculars there is a small ship resting on the water... Notice the two pipes, typical of those found on large boats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In between the binoculars there is a small ship resting on the water&#8230; Notice the two pipes, typical of those found on large boats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McKelvaney</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McKelvaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-291</guid>
		<description>@ Niki Brown, yeah inside the binoculars is a silhouette of a boat. 
Nice logo, but not too hot though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Niki Brown, yeah inside the binoculars is a silhouette of a boat.<br />
Nice logo, but not too hot though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Yes. There is a ship in the lower part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. There is a ship in the lower part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki Brown &#124; The Design O'Blog</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki Brown &#124; The Design O'Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-289</guid>
		<description>not sure I get this logo...i see the binoculars...but am I supposed to see something in the negative space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure I get this logo&#8230;i see the binoculars&#8230;but am I supposed to see something in the negative space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stout</title>
		<link>http://logooftheday.com/2008-12-20-ship-spotting/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://logooftheday.com/?p=167#comment-288</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little lukewarm on this solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little lukewarm on this solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/9 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk

Served from: logooftheday.com @ 2012-05-17 01:31:49 -->
